![]() |
| When I was in Solothurn, Switzerland |
Term such as inner and outer, politics and psychology, and good and bad are relative to one another. What seems inner today will be outer tomorrow. What we call psychology is politics for someone else. Evil for one group is what another defines as good. In process work, term are considered meaningful because they describe experience, which is changeable, not because they are absolute truths. In The Meaning of Relativity, Alberts Einstein wrote, "The only justification for our concepts and system of concepts is that they serve to represent the complex of our experiences; beyond this they have no legitimacy". Concepts of culture, normal and abnormal, healthy and ill even the concepts of race, gender and age, are only concepts. They represent the governing social paradigms. The very use of such terms can sustain the existing problems. Though we have employed them to create psychology, sociology and politics, these concepts are relative. When they are normative, they abuse people who feel they do not fit them. I introduced new concepts such as edges, time spirits and hot spots to include those experiences and individuals who are marginalized.
Social relativity predicts that if all the abusive tyrants gave up their power, and all the freedom fighters came into power, very little would change. If all the oppressed were to move forward and the oppressors were to step down, chance are the world would not change in sustainable way. Why? Because one power was blindly replaced with another. Only when all members of community grow in awareness of power in themselves and others can true change occur.
The world has seen countless revolutions. The cold war was won by democracy and capitalism. Yet these changes do not protect individual liberties or stimulate enough of us to participate in government. We are still unconscious of the day to day relativity of power and how it is used. It was the relativity of concepts.(Sitting in the Fire, Arnold Mindell)






